4.5 Article

Fiberboard Made from Scrap Denim: Characterization of its Properties by Effective Bulk Modulus Elastography

期刊

BIORESOURCES
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 3279-3294

出版社

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV DEPT WOOD & PAPER SCI
DOI: 10.15376/biores.18.2.3279-3294

关键词

Denim; Fiberboard; Acoustic; Effective bulk modulus elastography (EBME)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fiberboards were made from scrap denim with two different resins, melamine urea formaldehyde (MUF) and polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (pMDI). The resin content and MUF-pMDI weight ratio were investigated. Physical and mechanical tests were conducted to determine various properties. The study showed that resin content and MUF-pMDI ratio affected the properties, and increasing pMDI portion improved thickness swell and water absorption.
Fiberboards from scrap denim were fabricated using two different resins, melamine urea formaldehyde (MUF) and polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (pMDI). Resin content and MUF-pMDI weight ratio were studied. Physical and mechanical tests determined the modulus of elasticity (MOE), modulus of rupture (MOR), internal bond (IB), thickness swell (TS), and water absorption (WA). The resin content had significant impact on all properties. The MOE and IB were affected by the MUF-pMDI ratio. With 17 wt% more pMDI resin portion in the core layer of the denim boards, the IB for the denim fiberboard with a resin content of 15% was enhanced by 306%, while by 205% for the resin content of 25%. The increase in pMDI portion in the core layer of the boards improved both TS and WA of the scrap denim fiberboard. Effective bulk modulus elastography (EBME) was used to measure the acoustic reflection for the estimation of the strength properties of the denim fiberboard. The modulus results from EBME were correlated to the MOR, MOE, and IB of the denim fiberboard. A high correlation was found between the modulus from EBME and IB (R2 > 0.98). EBME can be a great technique to evaluate the bulk modulus distribution of the composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据