4.8 Article

Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor operation under high pressure for energy-rich biogas production

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 376, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128897

关键词

Autogenerative high pressure digestion; Biogas; High CH 4 content; Granule properties; Carbonic anhydrase; Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autogenerative high-pressure digestion has the advantage of producing CH4-rich biogas directly. In this study, a continuous operation of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB) was performed with pressure gradually increasing from 1 to 8 bar. The CH4 content in the biogas gradually increased with increasing pressure, reaching 96.7 ± 0.8% at 8 bar (309 MJ/m3 biogas). The physicochemical properties of granules were not adversely affected by the high pressure, and there was an increase in the production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and carbonic anhydrase gene expression.
Autogenerative high-pressure digestion has an advantage of producing CH4-rich biogas directly from the reactor. However, its continuous operation has rarely been reported, and has never been attempted in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB). Here, UASB was continuously operated at 10 g COD/L/d with increasing pressure from 1 to 8 bar. As the pressure increased, the CH4 content in the biogas increased gradually, reaching 96.7 & PLUSMN; 0.8% at 8 bar (309 MJ/m3 biogas). The pH was dropped from 8.2 to 7.2 with pressure increase, but COD removal efficiency was maintained > 90%. The high pressure up to 8 bar did not adversely impact the physicochemical properties of granules, which was due to the increased production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), particularly, tightly bound EPS (34% increase). With pressure increase, there was no changes in the microbial community and ATPase gene expression, but 41% increase in carbonic anhydrase gene expression was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据