4.0 Article

Immunoablative therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as the first-line disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis

期刊

BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PALACKY UNIV, MEDICAL FAC
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2023.023

关键词

multiple sclerosis; immunoablative therapy; autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This case series demonstrates that autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is a promising therapeutic approach to slow down the rapid progression of clinical disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with a good safety profile.
Introduction. Immunoablative therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is one of the possible disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). In this case series, we would like to present six patients with MS, who underwent AHSCT as the first-line DMT. Case reports. Six MS patients with a rapid progression of disability with or without relapses underwent AHSCT as the first-line DMT at the University Hospital Ostrava between 2018 and 2021.The conditioning regimens for AHSCT used were a medium-intensity regime BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposid, Cytarabin, Melphalan) and low-intensity regime based on Cyclophosphamide. Four out of six patients showed some disability progression after AHSCT, so the rapid progres-sion of MS was just slowed down by AHSCT. One patient developed activity on magnetic resonance imaging three months after AHSCT, and two experienced mild relapses during the follow-up period. None of our patients developed grade 4 non-hematological toxicity; all infections were mild. In one patient, an allergic reaction probably to dimethyl sulfoxide was observed. Conclusion. Our case series of 6 patients shows that AHSCT is a promising therapeutic approach to slow down the rapid progression of clinical disability in MS patients with a good safety profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据