4.8 Article

Ultrasonic-controlled ?explosive? hydrogels to precisely regulate spatiotemporal osteoimmune disturbance

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 295, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122057

关键词

Ultrasound; Remote control; Explosiveness; Spatiotemporal osteoimmune disturbance; Bone regeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed ultrasound-controlled explosive (UCE) hydrogels loaded with resveratrol nano-bubbles for precise regulation of spatiotemporal osteoimmune disorders. The release of resveratrol effectively inhibited local inflammatory response and regulated bone immune disorder, leading to accelerated bone repair.
Spatiotemporal Immune disorder is a key factor leading to the failure of bone tissue healing. It is of vital importance to accurately suppress excessive peak immune response within 24-48 h of the injury and so regulate the spatiotemporal osteoimmune disturbance of bones. In this study, Ultrasound Controlled Explosive (UCE) hydrogels were prepared from gelatin-hyaluronic acid methacrylate hydrogels loaded with resveratrol nano-bubbles produced by double emulsification through a condensation reaction. Such materials innovatively enable ultrasound-controlled RES release for precise regulation of spatiotemporal osteoimmune disorders. Under an ultrasonic power level of 1.5 W/cm2, the rate of effectively released RES through the blast of UCE hydrogels reached 38.14 %. And compared with the control group, the in vivo inhibition of inflammation and osteogenesis effects of UCE hydrogels were more effective, respectively. As suggested by the results, the excessive local in-flammatory response was inhibited by the release of resveratrol, the temporospatial disorder of bone immune was precisely regulated, and as a result, the process of bone repair was accelerated. Altogether, this study confirms that the newly created UCE Hydrogels effectively promote bone repair by intervening peak inflam-mation during the early phase of fracture healing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据