4.4 Article

Later stages of acute stress impair reinforcement-learning and feedback sensitivity in decision making

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108585

关键词

Stress; Decision making; Iowa Gambling Task; Computational model; Reinforcement -learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the effects of the later stages of acute stress on decision making and its underlying processes using a computational model. The results show that stress affects underlying cognitive strategies during decision making. Stressed participants showed deficits in reinforcement-learning and feedback sensitivity in decision tasks, but did not exhibit increased reward attraction.
Whereas the effects of the early stages of acute stress seem to improve learning and increase loss aversion in decision making, in later stages, the opposite has been found, an impairment in decision making probably due to higher reward-attraction, as the STARS approach suggests. This study aims to investigate the effects of the later stages of acute stress on decision making and its underlying processes using a computational model. We hypothesized that stress would affect underlying cognitive strategies during decision making. Ninety-five participants were randomly distributed into two groups, experimental (N = 46) and control (N = 49). A virtual version of The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) was used as a laboratory stressor. After 20 min, decision making was assessed by using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). The Value-Plus-Preservation (VPP) RL computational model was used to extract decision-making components. As expected, the stressed participants showed deficits in IGT performance on reinforcement-learning and feedback sensitivity. However, there was no gains attraction. These results are discussed by considering that decision making in later stages of acute stress could be based on impairments in prefrontal cortex functioning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据