4.4 Article

A data driven method for prioritizing invasive species to aid policy and management

期刊

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 2293-2307

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-023-03041-3

关键词

Invasive species; Management; Prioritization; iNaturalist; iMapInvasives

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural resource managers often struggle with prioritizing invasive species for management and surveys. This article presents a data-driven approach to create regionally specific invasive species lists based on management priorities, improving objectivity and consistency. The approach can be replicated in other regions and provide a common language for invasive species management.
Natural resource managers overseeing large regions are often challenged by an overwhelmingly long list of invasive species to prioritize for management and surveys. Often, managers determine priorities through subjective experience and not regional data, contributing to a lack of objectivity, consistency, and transparency. Using the invasion curve as a guiding principle, we developed a data-driven process to guide expert input in creating regionally specific invasive species lists based on management priorities. The invasive species tiers framework uses a standardized set of definitions, data from locational databases and invasiveness assessments, and expert review to categorize highly invasive species present in and surrounding the target regions. The analysis process was evaluated and improved by feedback from the structured network of invasive species managers in New York State. Results of the invasive species tiers process for eight management regions and at the state-scale were made publicly available, and demonstrated variation in invasive species diversity across the management landscape. The approach developed here can be replicated in and scaled to other regions of the U.S. or other countries with comparable data, and it can provide a common management language to better coordinate invasive species management efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据