4.7 Review

Delineating the tumour-regulatory roles of EYA4

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115466

关键词

EYA4; Tumour; Methylation profile; Biomarker; Therapeutic agent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

EYA4 is a protein involved in regulating cellular processes and organogenesis pathways, with functions as a phosphatase, hydrolase, and transcriptional activator. Mutations in Eya4 gene can cause hearing loss and heart disease. It acts as a tumor suppressor in non-nervous system cancers, but as a tumor promoter in nervous system tumors. EYA4 interacts with various signaling proteins and its expression level and methylation profiles can predict cancer prognosis and treatment response.
Eyes absent homolog 4 (EYA4) is a protein that regulates many vital cellular processes and organogenesis pathways. It possesses phosphatase, hydrolase, and transcriptional activation functions. Mutations in the Eya4 gene can cause sensorineural hearing loss and heart disease. In most non-nervous system cancers such as those of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), hematological and respiratory systems, EYA4 acts as a putative tumor suppressor. However, in nervous system tumors such as glioma, astrocytoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), it plays a putative tumor-promoting role. EYA4 interacts with various signaling proteins of the PI3K/ AKT, JNK/cJUN, Wnt/GSK-3I3, and cell cycle pathways to exert its tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressing effect. The tissue expression level and methylation profiles of Eya4 can help predict the prognosis and anti-cancer treatment response among cancer patients. Targeting and altering Eya4 expression and activity could be a po-tential therapeutic strategy to suppress carcinogenesis. In conclusion, EYA4 may have both putative tumor -promoting and tumor-suppressing roles in different human cancers and has the potential to serve as a prog-nostic biomarker and therapeutic agent in various cancer types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据