4.7 Article

Hydrophilic pretreatment of furfural residues to improve enzymatic hydrolysis

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 1675-1686

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-015-0602-6

关键词

Furfural residues; Green liquor; Pretreatment; Contact angle; Zeta potential

资金

  1. China Ministry of Science and Technology [2014DFG32550]
  2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Chemistry and Engineering of Forest Products [GXFC13-03]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BLYJ201415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Furfural residues (FRs) is an industrial waste material with an enormous potential for bio-ethanol production. In this study, FRs were pretreated with green liquor (GL) combined with hydrogen peroxide (GL H2O2) or ethanol (GL-ethanol). The wettability and electrostatic contributions of untreated and pretreated FRs was investigated as well as that of isolated lignin cellulolytic enzyme lignin (CEL) and cellulose. The results showed that the hydrophilicity of FRs was increased after GL-H2O2 and GL-ethanol pretreatment. Lignin is the key factor that affects the hydrophilicity of substrate. The cellulase binding for lignin was reduced due to the increase of hydrophilicity of lignin, resulting in the improvement of enzymatic hydrolysis. The electrostatic contributions was also an important factor that influenced the cellulase binding of lignin. After pretreatments, the negative charge of lignin was decreased. Accordingly, the cellulase binding capacity was reduced. This effect was more significant after the GL-ethanol pretreatment. Thus, the glucose yield of the substrate obtained from the GL-ethanol pretreatment (86.1 %) was larger than that from the GL-H2O2 pretreatment (82.2 %). Unlike the CEL, GL-H2O2 pretreatment increased the negative charge of cellulose. And the increase of negative charge improved the affinity of cellulose to cellulase via electrostatic attraction. The XPS analyses indicated that the carbonyl groups from lignin play an important role in decreasing the hydrophobicity of the substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据