4.6 Article

Modeling virus filtration based on a multilayer membrane morphology and pore size distribution

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2023.108903

关键词

Bioseparations; Viral clearance; Log-normal distribution; Multilayer membrane structure; Pore size distribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obtaining adequate viral clearance is a challenge in biopharmaceutical manufacturing. This study models virus filter performance using a multilayered membrane structure and compares it to experimental data. The method relies on three fitted parameters that can be determined from experimental data and allows for quantitative reproduction and analysis of virus filter characteristics.
Obtaining adequate viral clearance in the manufacture of biopharmaceuticals is a major challenge. While virus filtration is routinely used for this purpose, there have been few attempts to model virus filter performance. Here, virus filter performance is modeled in consideration of a multilayered membrane structure with a membrane pore size distribution that is assumed to be the same log-normal distribution in each membrane layer. Com-parison of experimental data both for constant pressure and constant flux filtration to the model calculations showed good agreement. This method relies on three fitted parameters that can easily be determined from experimental data: particle size that blocks the membrane pores, particle density and the maximum pore size that can capture a particle. In addition, high virus removability was confirmed by the model calculations. By applying the calculation method introduced here, it becomes possible to quantitatively reproduce and analyze the filtration characteristics of virus filters. Based on analysis using the numerical calculation method presented in this study, we demonstrated the equivalence of constant pressure filtration and constant flux filtration. This method also shows potential for predicting filtration behavior based on minimal experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据