4.6 Article

Conditioned approach behavior of SHR and SD rats during Pavlovian conditioning

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 443, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114348

关键词

Reward; Pavlovian conditioned approach; Spontaneously hypertensive rat; Sign tracking; Goal tracking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individual differences in reward-related learning play a role in behavioral disorders. The SHR, a rat model for ADHD, shows elevated sensitivity to delay of reward. In a Pavlovian conditioned approach task, both SHR and SD rats learned to associate a lever cue with reward, but SHR showed less lever pressing and more magazine entries during cue presentation, indicating attenuated incentive value attribution.
Individual differences in reward-related learning are relevant to many behavioral disorders. Sensory cues that predict reward can become incentive stimuli that adaptively support behavior, or alternatively, cause mal-adaptive behaviors. The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) expresses a genetically determined elevated sensitivity to delay of reward, and has been extensively studied as a behavioral model for attention deficit hy-peractivity disorder (ADHD). We investigated reward-related learning in the SHR, comparing them to Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats as a reference strain. A standard Pavlovian conditioned approach task was used, in which a lever cue was followed by reward. Lever presses could occur while the lever was extended, but had no effect on reward delivery. The behavior of both the SHRs and the SD rats showed that they learnt that the lever cue predicted reward. However, the pattern of behavior differed between the strains. During lever cue presentation, SD rats pressed the lever more often and made fewer magazine entries than SHRs. When lever contacts that did not result in lever presses were analyzed, there was no significant difference between SHRs and SDs. These results suggest that the SHRs attributed less incentive value to the conditioned stimulus than the SD rats. During the presentation of the conditioned cue, cue directed responses are called sign tracking responses, whereas responses directed towards the food magazine are called goal tracking responses. Analysis of behavior using a standard Pavlovian conditioned approach index to quantify sign and goal tracking tendencies showed that both strains had a tendency towards goal tracking in this task. However, the SHRs showed a significantly greater goal tracking tendency than the SD rats. Taken together, these findings suggest that attribution of incentive value to reward predicting cues is attenuated in SHRs, which might explain their elevated sensitivity to delay of reward.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据