4.5 Article

Cyclopeptide mushroom poisoning: A retrospective series of 204 patients

期刊

BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY
卷 132, 期 6, 页码 533-542

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13858

关键词

acute liver failure; Amanita phalloides poisoning; amatoxins; cyclopeptide mushroom; mushroom poisoning; poison control centres; severity factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study summarizes 204 cases of amatoxin toxicity reported to two French Poison Centers from 2013 through 2019. The findings indicate that over one-third of patients developed acute renal injury, nine patients died, and five patients received a liver transplant.
Cyclopeptide mushroom poisoning is responsible for 90%-95% of deaths from macrofungi ingestion. The main objectives of this study are to describe cases of cyclopeptide mushroom poisoning and to determine risk factors that may influence the severity/mortality of poisoned patients. We included all cases of amatoxin toxicity reported to two French Poison Centers from 2013 through 2019. We compared the severity with the Poison Severity Score (PSS) and the outcomes of patients using simple logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression. We included 204 cases of amatoxin toxicity. More than three-quarters developed an increase in AST and/or ALT (78.1%), and over half developed a decrease in prothrombin ratio (<70%: 53%) and/or Factor V (<70%: 54%). One-third developed an acute renal injury (AKI). Twelve patients (5.9%) developed post-poisoning sequelae (persistent kidney injury more than 1 month after ingestion and liver transplant). Five patients (2.5%) received a liver transplant, and nine died (4.4%). The mean time to onset of digestive disorders was shorter in PSS2 and PSS3-4 patients (10.9 +/- 3.9/11.3 +/- 6.3 h) than in PSS1 patients (14 +/- 6.5 h; p < 0.05). Patients who died or developed post-poisoning sequelae had more frequent cardiovascular comorbidities compared with recovered patients (60.0% versus 29.5%; p < 0.01).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据