4.7 Review

Existing assets maintenance management: Optimizing maintenance procedures and costs through BIM tools

期刊

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104788

关键词

Asset maintenance; Facility management; Building information modeling; Building condition assessment; Monitoring; Common data environmental

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research proposes a method supported by BIM tools to improve maintenance processes by integrating Building Condition Assessment (BCA) with Building Information Modeling (BIM) to collect, digitize, and evaluate the physical and performance conditions of assets in order to enhance management and maintenance processes.
Control and maintenance strategies are essential to preserve and ensure an adequate level of safety and func-tionality of civil or historical assets. In recent years, digital transformation is promoting new operational methods for Facility Management (FM) with the use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) systems. The research proposes a method supported by BIM tools to improve maintenance processes in terms of efficiency, quality and speed. The method consists of the integration of Building Condition Assessment (BCA) with Building Information Modeling (BIM) in order to collect, digitize and evaluate the physical and performance conditions of assets to improve management and maintenance processes. The results show two procedures for data collection and integration into the BIM model. The first procedure uses mobile devices and Excel spreadsheets as databases imported into the BIM model through a Visual Programming Language (VPL). The second procedure uses a system of Common Data Environmental (CDE) that capture data from on-site monitoring sensors and link them to the BIM model. The case studies concern an existing building of historical and cultural value, the Brunelleschi's Cloister, and a viaduct belonging to a road infrastructure.(c) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据