4.7 Article

Nonlinear full information and moving horizon estimation: Robust global asymptotic stability

期刊

AUTOMATICA
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110603

关键词

Moving horizon estimation; Full information estimation; Robust stability; Nonlinear systems; Detectability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, time-discounted schemes for full information estimation (FIE) and moving horizon estimation (MHE) are proposed, which are robustly globally asymptotically stable (RGAS). The authors consider general nonlinear system dynamics with nonlinear process and output disturbances. The sufficient conditions for the existence of RGAS observers are provided based on the stability result for FIE. Convergence of the estimation error is guaranteed for both FIE and MHE schemes without incorporating a priori knowledge.
In this paper, we propose time-discounted schemes for full information estimation (FIE) and moving horizon estimation (MHE) that are robustly globally asymptotically stable (RGAS). We consider general nonlinear system dynamics with nonlinear process and output disturbances that are a priori unknown. For FIE being RGAS, our only assumptions are that the system is time-discounted incrementally input- output-to-state-stable (i-IOSS) and that the time-discounted FIE cost function is compatible with the i-IOSS estimate. Since for i-IOSS systems such a compatible cost function can always be designed, we show that i-IOSS is sufficient for the existence of RGAS observers. Based on the stability result for FIE, we provide sufficient conditions such that the induced MHE scheme is RGAS as well for sufficiently large horizons. For both schemes, we can guarantee convergence of the estimation error in case the disturbances converge to zero without incorporating a priori knowledge. Finally, we present explicit converge rates and show how to verify that the MHE results approach the FIE results for increasing horizons.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据