4.6 Review

Non-pharmacological interventions in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103323

关键词

Systematic literature review; meta -analysis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Non -pharmacological treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the effect of non-pharmaceutical therapies on disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis through systematic review and meta-analysis. The results suggest that certain non-pharmacological therapies may modestly improve clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, many studies lack full reporting and further well-designed clinical trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of these therapies.
Purpose: To investigate the role of non-pharmaceutical therapies on disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis through systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods: A review of Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed from inception until March 26, 2019. Only randomized controlled trials which assessed oral, non-pharmacological interventions (e.g. diets, vitamins, oils, herbal remedies, fatty acids, supplements, etc.) in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, that presented clinically-relevant outcomes (defined as pain, fatigue, disability, joint counts, and/or disease indices) were included in our meta-analysis. Data were analyzed as mean differences between active and placebo and forest plots were performed. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I-squared statistics while funnel plots and Cochrane's risk of bias assessment evaluated bias.Results: 8170 articles were identified in the search and 51 were RCTs were included. The mean difference in DAS28 was significantly improved in experimental group treated with diet (-0.46 [-0.91,-0.02], p = 0.04), zinc sulfate, copper sulphate, selenium, potassium, lipoic acid, turmeric, pomegranate extract, chamomile, and cranberry extract supplements (-0.77 [-1.17, -0.38], p < 0.001), A, B6, C, D, E, and K vitamins (-0.52 [-0.74,-0.29], p < 0.001), and fatty acids (-0.19 [-0.36,-0.01], p = 0.03). Other clinical metrics such as SJC, TJC, HAQ, SDAI, ACR20, and self-reported pain were decreased in the treatment groups. There was significant reporting bias in the studies.Conclusion: Some non-pharmacological therapies may modestly improve some clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Many identified studies lacked full reporting. Further clinical trials that are well-designed, adequately powered, and sufficiently report ACR improvement criteria or EULAR response criteria outcomes are needed to confirm the efficacy of these therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据