4.6 Article

Tuning the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Observing Strategy for Solar System Science

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/acc173

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory is preparing for the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) in 2025, aiming to transform our understanding of the solar system by discovering and monitoring over five million small bodies. The LSST survey strategy plays a crucial role in the discovery and characterization of solar system minor planets and passing interstellar objects. To optimize the LSST survey strategy, a series of operation simulations have been conducted to explore different observing parameters and priorities. The impact of these simulated LSST observing strategies on studying the solar system's small body reservoirs has been examined, highlighting the importance of maximizing LSST solar system science.
The Vera C. Rubin Observatory is expected to start the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) in early to mid-2025. This multiband wide-field synoptic survey will transform our view of the solar system, with the discovery and monitoring of over five million small bodies. The final survey strategy chosen for LSST has direct implications on the discoverability and characterization of solar system minor planets and passing interstellar objects. Creating an inventory of the solar system is one of the four main LSST science drivers. The LSST observing cadence is a complex optimization problem that must balance the priorities and needs of all the key LSST science areas. To design the best LSST survey strategy, a series of operation simulations using the Rubin Observatory scheduler have been generated to explore the various options for tuning observing parameters and prioritizations. We explore the impact of the various simulated LSST observing strategies on studying the solar system's small body reservoirs. We examine what are the best observing scenarios and review what are the important considerations for maximizing LSST solar system science. In general, most of the LSST cadence simulations produce +/- 5% or less variations in our chosen key metrics, but a subset of the simulations significantly hinder science returns with much larger losses in the discovery and light-curve metrics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据