4.6 Article

Searching for Double-line Spectroscopic Binaries in the LAMOST Medium-resolution Spectroscopic Survey with Deep Learning

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/acc94e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Double-line spectroscopic binaries (SB2s) are an important class of spectroscopic binaries for studying star formation and evolution. Searching for SB2s has been a popular topic in astronomy, but limitations in automation and accuracy still exist. In this study, a convolutional neural network model was developed to search for SB2 candidates by detecting double peaks in the cross-correlation function (CCF) in LAMOST medium-resolution survey (MRS) data. The model achieved an accuracy of 97.76% and successfully identified 728 candidate SB2s, including 281 newly discovered ones.
Double-line spectroscopic binaries (SB2s) are a vital class of spectroscopic binaries for studying star formation and evolution. Searching for SB2s has been a hot topic in astronomy. Although considerable efforts have been made with fruitful outcomes, limitations in automation and accuracy still persist. In this study, we developed a convolutional neural network model to search for SB2 candidates in LAMOST medium-resolution survey (MRS) data release (DR) 9 v1.0 by detecting double peaks in the cross-correlation function (CCF). We first generated a large number of spectra of single stars and binaries using the iSpec spectral synthesis software. The CCFs of these synthesized spectra were then calculated to form our training set. To efficiently detect the peaks of the CCFs, we applied a Softmax function-based noise reduction method. After testing and validation, the model achieved an accuracy of 97.76% in the testing set and was validated for more than 90% of the sample in several published SB2 catalogs. Finally, by applying the model to examine approximately 1.59 million LAMOST-MRS DR9 spectra, we identified 728 candidate SB2s, including 281 newly discovered ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据