4.7 Article

Measuring the Speed of Light with Updated Hubble Diagram of High-redshift Standard Candles

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 949, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc7a5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a new method to investigate the possible time variation of the speed of light by analyzing the Hubble diagram of high-redshift standard candles. The authors found that there is no strong evidence for deviation from a constant speed of light up to z similar to 2 based on the SNe Ia Pantheon sample and high-redshift quasars. They also discuss future improvements in measuring the speed of light at much higher redshifts using gravitational waves produced by binary neutron star mergers.
The possible time variation of the fundamental constants of nature has been an active subject of research in modern physics. In this paper, we propose a new method to investigate such possible time variation of the speed of light c using the updated Hubble diagram of high-redshift standard candles including Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) and high-redshift quasars (based on UV-X relation). Our findings show that the SNe Ia Pantheon sample, combined with currently available sample of cosmic chronometers, would produce robust constraints on the speed of light at the level of c/c (0) = 1.03 +/- 0.03. For the Hubble diagram of UV+X-ray quasars acting as a new type of standard candle, we obtain c/c (0) = 1.19 +/- 0.07. Therefore, our results confirm that there is no strong evidence for deviation from a constant speed of light up to z similar to 2. Moreover, we discuss how our technique might be improved at much higher redshifts (z similar to 5), focusing on future measurements of the acceleration parameter X(z) with gravitational waves (GWs) produced by binary neutron star mergers. In particular, in the framework of the second-generation space-based GW detector, DECi-hertz Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory, the speed of light is expected to be constrained with a precision of Delta c/c = 10(-3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据