4.6 Article

A brief survey on recent advances in coreference resolution

期刊

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-023-10506-3

关键词

Coreference resolution; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The task of resolving repeated objects in natural languages, known as coreference resolution, is an important part of modern natural language processing. It is classified into entity coreference resolution and event coreference resolution based on the resolved objects. Predicting coreference connections and identifying mentions/triggers are the major challenges in coreference resolution due to the difficulty of implicit relationships in natural language understanding. In this survey, we review the current employed evaluation metrics, datasets, and methods, investigating 10 widely used metrics, 18 datasets, and 4 main technical trends. We believe that this work provides a comprehensive roadmap for understanding the past and the future of coreference resolution.
The task of resolving repeated objects in natural languages is known as coreference resolution, and it is an important part of modern natural language processing. It is classified into two categories depending on the resolved objects, namely entity coreference resolution and event coreference resolution. Predicting coreference connections and identifying mentions/triggers are the major challenges in coreference resolution, because these implicit relationships are particularly difficult in natural language understanding in downstream tasks. Coreference resolution techniques have experienced considerable advances in recent years, encouraging us to review this task in the following aspects: current employed evaluation metrics, datasets, and methods. We investigate 10 widely used metrics, 18 datasets and 4 main technical trends in this survey. We believe that this work is a comprehensive roadmap for understanding the past and the future of coreference resolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据