4.2 Article

Local variability of a taiga snow cover due to vegetation and microtopography

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15230430.2023.2170086

关键词

Snow; taiga; stratigraphy; interception

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of vegetation, microtopography, and microclimatic variability on taiga snow near Fairbanks, Alaska. The results show that different vegetation and topography can alter the structure of the snow cover, leading to irregular snow layers. A conceptual framework is proposed to understand and model taiga snow variability in terms of vegetation and microtopography.
The taiga snow cover accumulates in relatively stable and windless weather. This should produce a uniform snow cover with continuous, laterally homogeneous stratigraphy and snow properties when the snow is deposited on a level, smooth substrate. However, such substrates are rare, and local variations in vegetation and ground surface topography alter the structure of the snow cover and produce irregular snow layers. In this study, we investigated the effects of vegetation, microtopography, and microclimatic variability on the taiga snow near Fairbanks, Alaska. Through the winter of 2019-2020, in situ measurements were made at three locations with distinctly different local microtopographic features and radically different (but typical) vegetation. One site was an open grassy field, the second a mature spruce forest, and the third a birch forest located on thermokarst terrain with steep microrelief where ice wedges had degraded. Widely different canopy interception processes proved to have the strongest impact on the resulting snow cover heterogeneity by altering the initial deposition, with surface microtopography having the second strongest influence through postdepositional processes. In this article, we suggest a conceptual framework for understanding and modeling taiga snow variability in terms of the vegetation and microtopography that created it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据