Effects of green tea extract epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption in rats

Objective: To study the effect of EGCG on tooth movement and root resorption during orthodontic treatment in rats.Methods: A total of thirty six male Wistar rats were randomly and equally divided into three groups: control, 50 mg/kg EGCG, and 100 mg/kg EGCG. During the experiment, the subjects were submitted to an orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) model, rats in the experimental groups were given the corresponding dose of EGCG, while rats in the control group were administrated with an equal volume of normal saline solution by gavage. After 14 days of OTM, the rats were sacrificed by transcardial perfusion. Micro-CT of rat maxillaes was taken to analyze OTM distance and root resorption. The maxillary samples were prepared as histological sections for H&E staining, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining to be observed and analyzed. Results: The OTM distance and root resorption of rats in the dosed group decreased, and the number of TRAP positive cells in their periodontium decreased significantly. The expression level of RANKL was decreased in the EGCG group compared to the control group, while that of OPG, OCN and Runx2 was increased. Effects were more pronounced in 100 mg/kg group than in 50 mg/kg group.Conclusion: EGCG reduces OTM and orthodontic induced root resorption (OIRR) in rats, and is able to attenuate osteoclastogenesis on the pressure side and promote osteogenesis on the tension side.

Automated summary

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of EGCG on tooth movement and root resorption during orthodontic treatment in rats. The results showed that EGCG reduced the distance of tooth movement and root resorption, decreased the number of TRAP positive cells in the periodontium, and decreased the expression level of RANKL while increasing the expression level of OPG, OCN, and Runx2. The effects were more pronounced in the 100 mg/kg group compared to the 50 mg/kg group.