4.7 Article

Cultivation of the brackish-water macroalga Ulva lactuca in wastewater from land-based fish and shrimp aquacultures in Germany

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 571, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739463

关键词

Macroalgae; Aquaculture; Wastewater; Seaweed

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the growth of Ulva lactuca L. in a land-based cultivation using different aquaculture effluents as medium. The results showed that the biggest growth rates were achieved when cultivating in catfish and shrimp wastewater, while cultivation in pikeperch wastewater led to a decrease in growth rate. Additionally, using shrimp wastewater enhanced the photosynthetic activity and quenching ability of Ulva lactuca.
This study aimed to examine the cultivation of the brackish-water macroalga Ulva lactuca L., known as a seaweed with a high growth rate, in a land-based cultivation over 30 days using different aquaculture effluents as me-dium. The used wastewater was provided by four land-based aquaculture facilities located in Germany, which produced shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei), catfish (Clarias gariepinus), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) respectively. Except for an initial solid-liquid separation, the different wastewaters remained untreated and, with the exception of the catfish wastewater, undiluted when used as culture medium. When cultivated in catfish and shrimp wastewater U. lactuca showed maximum growth rates of 4.17% d-1 (after 10 days) and 3.76% d-1 (after 20 days) respectively. In comparison, the growth rate of the control group using only Provasoli Enriched seawater medium was approx. 2.65% d-1. Furthermore, using shrimp wastewater also significantly increased the photosynthetic activity (ETRmax) and the quenching ability (Y(II)) of U. lactuca whereas pikeperch wastewater led to a significant decrease of ETRmax. In contrast, cultivation in catfish and trout wastewater did not affect photosynthetic activity or quenching ability in comparison to the control group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据