4.7 Article

Comparative analysis of the growth and biochemical composition of backcrosses and their parents in abalone

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 570, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739445

关键词

Backcross; Heterosis; Growth; Biochemical composition; Abalone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interspecific hybridization and back-crossing can improve the yield and quality of abalone. In this study, backcrosses were conducted between hybrids and their parental species, and the growth, survival, and muscle nutritional components of five abalone populations were compared. The results showed that backcrosses had advantages in growth and survival, and their nutritional components were intermediate between their parents. This study provides useful information for the development of the abalone industry.
Abalone is a valuable and popular seafood with high nutritional value. Interspecific hybridization and back-crossing are effective ways to improve the yield and quality of abalone. In this study, interspecific backcrosses were conducted between the hybrids of Haliotis discus hannai female x H. fulgens male and their parental species. The backcrosses comprised five populations based on crossing combinations: hybrid F1 (DF), purebreds (DD, FF) and backcross populations (DD x DF and DF x FF). The growth, survival, and muscle nutritional components of five abalone populations were compared in a 13-month culture experiment. The results showed that DF and DD x DF had significant advantages in growth and survival. For nutritional components, backcrosses had levels of crude protein, crude lipid, and glycogen that were intermediate between their parents and were biased toward the respective recurrent parents. The assessment of production performance indicated that DF and DD x DF may have potential applications in the abalone aquaculture industry. This study has provided useful information for the healthy and sustainable development of the abalone industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据