4.7 Article

Thermal performance improvement of a LS-2 parabolic trough solar collector using porous disks

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120546

关键词

Porous media; LS-2 parabolic trough collector; Porous disks; Turbulent flow; Thermal efficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a thorough numerical investigation of a LS-2 parabolic trough collector (PTC) to introduce a manufacturable structure with high performance. The effects of design shapes, diameters, spacings, and PPI of porous materials, as well as thermal and fluidic features, on the performance of PTC are studied. It is found that increasing PPI and diameter while reducing space gaps can improve the thermal efficiency of PTC. The effects of volumetric flow rate and inlet flow temperature on thermal efficiency are also analyzed.
This study presents a thorough numerical investigation of a LS-2 parabolic trough collector (PTC) to introduce a manufacturable structure with high performance. This is done by considering all influential parameters such as possible design shapes (full, upward half, and downward half), diameters, spacings, and PPI (pores per inch) of porous materials along with thermal and fluidic features of heat transfer fluid used inside the absorber pipe. It is found that the full-disk cases perform better than half-disk options. Moreover, the thermal efficiency of PTC improves by increasing PPI and the diameter of porous disks, as well as by reducing the space gaps between the disks. Studying the effects of volumetric flow rate and inlet flow temperature shows that the thermal efficiency diminishes by increasing inlet temperature and decreasing flow rate. In addition, the variations of Nusselt number and friction factor for all mentioned parameters are studied, and performance evaluation criteria are developed to assess the simultaneous effects of enhancing heat transfer against increasing the pumping power.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据