4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of a novel bacterial cellulose-poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrene sulfonate) composite for use in biomedical applications

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 2141-2148

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-015-0683-2

关键词

Bacterial cellulose; Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrene sulfonate); Composites; Biocompatibility; Biomedical; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea [NRF-2014-R1A1A2055756]
  2. BK21 plus, Korea [21A.2013-1800001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the biocompatible behavior of bacterial cellulose (BC) composites with the highly conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). To synthesize this novel composite, we utilized an ex situ penetration method, whereby never-dried BC sheets were incubated with aqueous PEDOT: PSS solution. The resulting composite films were characterized using several analytical tools. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy illustrated the impregnation of PEDOT: PSS into the BC matrix, while the uniform dispersion of PEDOT: PSS in the composites was confirmed with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The conductivity of the PEDOT: PSS incorporated BC was 7.3 9 10(-2) +/- 0.021 S/cm with 29.37 +/- 2.13 weight percentage (wt%) of PEDOT: PSS. The biocompatibility of the BC-PEDOT: PSS film was tested against animal fibroblast cells. The composites showed excellent cell adhesion and proliferation. The animal cells showed filopodia formation and interconnectivity during 3 days of incubation. The cytotoxicity of the BC-PEDOT:PSS film was also assayed, confirming the non-toxic nature of this composite. Taken together, our results demonstrate that this novel biocompatible BC-PEDOT:PSS composite could potentially be used for biomedical applications, particularly in the biosensors, drug delivery devices, neural implants, and tissue engineering fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据