4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of nano-polycrystal diamonds on refractory high entropy alloys by chemical vapour deposition

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 623, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157108

关键词

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD); Diamond films; Nucleation; High entropy alloy; Carbides; Interface

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have successfully grown diamond films on high entropy alloys (HEAs) substrates using chemical vapour deposition, which are facilitated by the high carbon solubility and lower nucleation energy barrier of HEAs. Continuous diamond films with high nucleation density and rapid growth have been achieved within 30 minutes, and the corrosion resistance of the specimens in saltwater has been improved due to the continuous diamond film.
Growing diamond has been a long-standing challenge. It is found the diamond grows on refractory metals (such as Zr, Hf, Ti) hardly to form a continuous film with a high nucleation density because of diffusion of carbon. In this study, we reported an approach to grow diamond on high entropy alloys (HEAs) of TiZrHfTaMo, TiZrHfNbMo, TiHfNbTaMo as substrates by chemical vapour deposition. Diamond films with a nucleation density as much as 108 -1010 site/cm2 grow on the mixed-carbides XC (X = Hf, Zr and Ta etc.) layer, which is 2 -3 orders of constituent metals. The orientation relationship is identified as diamond[0 1 1] // XC[001] with XC mixed-carbides by high resolution transmission electron microscope. The continuous diamond films can be obtained within 30 min. The high nucleation density and rapid growth on HEAs refer to solubility of carbon and relative nucleation energy barrier. Moreover, the corrosion of current specimens in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution have been improved (e.g., corrosion potential value is as much as-0.02 V/SCE) because of the continuous diamond film. Current result facilitates promising industrial applications of HEAs and diamonds by combining the ad-vantages of them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据