4.7 Article

Bio-inspired V-TiO2 architectures with regulable surface ultrastructure for visible-light photocatalytic selective oxidation of cyclohexane

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 622, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156957

关键词

Biotemplating; Vanadium-dopedTiO2; Photocatalysis; Selective oxidation; Cyclohexane

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, vanadium-doped TiO2 with a needle-like surface ultrastructure was successfully prepared using a solvent-thermal-assisted biotemplating method. The use of glycerol and vanadium doping improved the performance of the photocatalyst, resulting in a significant increase in cyclohexane conversion.
Photocatalytic selective oxidation of cyclohexane is more energy saving and sustainable when compared with traditional thermal catalysis, but highly effective visible-light photocatalyst for this reaction remains challenging. Herein, vanadium-doped TiO2 was prepared by using a solvent-thermal-assisted biotemplating method, while glycerol was used to regulate the surface ultrastructure of the catalyst. It is found that the use of the biotemplate, regulation of the surface ultrastructure of the catalyst by glycerol, as well as vanadium doping are all beneficial to improve the performance of the photocatalyst. Resultantly, the biotemplated TiO2 doped with 2 % vanadium, which has a needle-like surface ultrastructure (2 %V-CTiO2(g)) achieves the best performance for cyclohexane conversion (0.98 %), which is 7.0, 8.9 and 49 times higher than TiO2 sample without vanadium doping, surface ultrastructure adjustment and biotemplating, respectively. Characterizations and DFT calculations confirm that biotemplating and the use of glycerol endow the sample with unique morphology, oxygen vacancies and high surface area. Doping of vanadium not only changes the band structure of TiO2 but also introduces the inter-conversion of V4+ and V5+ into the photocatalytic process. This work offers a new approach to the green con-version of cyclohexane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据