4.6 Article

Lattice parameters of ScxAl1-xN layers grown on GaN(0001) by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 122, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0137873

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using high-resolution x-ray diffractometry, the lattice parameters of undoped ScxAl1-xN layers grown on GaN templates were determined. The Sc content x of the layers was measured independently and ranged from 0 to 0.25. The in-plane lattice parameter of the layers increased linearly with increasing x, while the out-of-plane lattice parameter remained constant. Layers with x≈0.09 were lattice matched to GaN, resulting in a smooth surface and comparable structural perfection. In addition, a two-dimensional electron gas was induced at the ScxAl1-xN/GaN heterointerface, with the highest sheet electron density and mobility observed for lattice-matched conditions.
An accurate knowledge of lattice parameters of ScxAl1-xN is essential for understanding the elastic and piezoelectric properties of this compound as well as for the ability to engineer its strain state in heterostructures. Using high-resolution x-ray diffractometry, we determine the lattice parameters of 100-nm-thick undoped ScxAl1-xN layers grown on GaN(0001) templates by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. The Sc content x of the layers is measured independently by both x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, and it ranges from 0 to 0.25. The in-plane lattice parameter of the layers linearly increases with increasing x, while their out-of-plane lattice parameter remains constant. Layers with x approximate to 0.09 are found to be lattice matched to GaN, resulting in a smooth surface and a structural perfection equivalent to that of the GaN underlayer. In addition, a two-dimensional electron gas is induced at the ScxAl1-xN/GaN heterointerface, with the highest sheet electron density and mobility observed for lattice-matched conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据