4.6 Article

Surface defects related to polishing cycle in β-Ga2O3 crystals grown by floating zone

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 122, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0149969

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated beta-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diodes grown on substrates using various characterization techniques and electrical measurements. Four electron trap levels were identified, with one near the surface and the others showing similarities to the literature. The surface trap was found to be linked to substrate polishing damage, while an energy band at the metal-semiconductor interface was also detected. These interface states and surface deep traps contributed to the degradation of diode performance.
We report an investigation on beta-Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diodes performed on substrates grown by floating-zone method using structural characterization techniques (secondary-ion mass spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy) and electrical measurements (current-voltage, capacitance-voltage, Hall effect, and capacitance deep-level transient spectroscopy). Four distinct electron trap levels labeled ES, E1, E2, and E3 were found in the range of 1 eV below the Ga2O3 conduction band minimum. Among them, E1, E2, and E3 show signatures similar to those reported in the literature for Czochralski and edge-defined film-fed grown beta-Ga2O3 substrates. Trap ES was found near the surface, and we could establish a link between this defect and the damage induced by the substrate polishing technique. The level related to ES was identified at similar to 0.31 eV below the conduction band minimum. An energy band above 0.31 eV was also detected and is associated with states at the metal-semiconductor interface. We demonstrated that the interface states and surface deep traps are not uniformly distributed on the beta-Ga2O3 surface. Furthermore, they contribute to the reverse leakage current and the on-state conduction degradation of the diodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据