4.6 Article

Multiple dimension-component designed Co/Co9S8/Ti3C2Tx MXene composite for enhanced microwave absorption

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 122, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0142497

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By designing the composition and structure of the 1D/2D Co/Co9S8/Ti3C2Tx composite, the electromagnetic responsiveness of the absorber can be modulated. Due to the unique structure and dielectric-magnetic synergistic loss, the composite exhibits an effective absorption bandwidth of 5.36 GHz at 2.1 mm and an RLmin value of -52.02 dB at 1.8 mm.
The two-dimensional (2D) transition metal carbide Ti3C2Tx MXene is a potential candidate for efficient electromagnetic wave absorbers due to its excellent intrinsic conductivity and structural machinability. However, Ti3C2Tx MXene also has some problems (such as self-stacking and single loss mechanism) that limit its practical electromagnetic wave absorption. Based on the electromagnetic wave absorption mechanism, electromagnetic responsiveness of absorbers can be modulated by designing the composition and structure. Herein, a 1D/2D Co/Co9S8/Ti3C2Tx composite has been synthesized by assembling 2D Ti3C2Tx MXene with the designed 1D magnetic structure. The 1D Co/Co9S8 was designed as a core-sheath structure that avoids magnetic agglomeration, and the assembly with 2D Ti3C2Tx sheets alleviates the self-stacking problem of Ti3C2Tx MXene sheets. More importantly, the magnetic component enriches the electromagnetic wave dissipation mechanism, and the multiple heterojunction surfaces provide strong polarization loss capability for the Ti3C2Tx MXene-based absorber. Benefiting from the unique structure and dielectric-magnetic synergistic loss, the Co/Co9S8/Ti3C2Tx composite shows an effective absorption bandwidth of 5.36 GHz (10.08-15.44 GHz) at 2.1 mm and the optimal RLmin value of -52.02 dB at 1.8 mm. This work provides an innovative idea for the design of effective Ti3C2Tx MXene-based absorbers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据