4.6 Article

Low-threshold lasing of optically pumped micropillar lasers with Al0.2Ga0.8As/Al0.9Ga0.1As distributed Bragg reflectors

期刊

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
卷 122, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0143236

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, optically pumped micropillar lasers with low-absorbing Al0.2Ga0.8As/Al0.9Ga0.1As dielectric Bragg reflectors were designed and characterized. The incorporation of 20% Al content in the DBRs significantly improved the pump efficiency by creating an optical pumping window from 700 to 820 nm. Experimental observations also showed that pump laser wavelengths outside of the specific range resulted in reduced pump efficiency.
We report on the design, realization, and characterization of optically pumped micropillar lasers with low-absorbing Al0.2Ga0.8As/Al0.9Ga0.1As dielectric Bragg reflectors (DBRs) instead of commonly used GaAs/AlGaAs DBRs. A layer of (In, Ga)As quantum dots is embedded in the GaAs lambda-cavity of as an active medium. We experimentally study the lasing characteristics of the fabricated micropillars by means of low-temperature photoluminescence with varying pump laser wavelength between 532 and 899 nm. The incorporation of 20% Al content in the DBRs opens an optical pumping window from 700 to 820 nm, where the excitation laser light can effectively reach the GaAs cavity above its bandgap while remaining transparent to the DBRs. This results in a substantially improved pump efficiency, a low lasing threshold, and a high thermal stability. Pump laser wavelengths outside of the engineered spectral window lead to low pump efficiency due to strong absorption by the top DBR or inefficient excitation of pump-level excitons. The superiority of the absorption-free modified DBRs is demonstrated by simply switching the pump laser wavelength from 671 to 708 nm, which crosses the DBRs absorption edge and drastically reduces the lasing threshold by more than an order of magnitude from (363.5 +/- 18.5) to (12.8 +/- 0.3) mu W.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据