4.6 Article

Broadband circular dichroism in chiral plasmonic woodpiles

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-023-06481-9

关键词

Complex bandstructure; Circular dichroism; Plasmonic crystal; Chiral woodpile; Thermal emission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The circular dichroism (CD) is crucial for various applications, and artificial chiral materials have been developed due to the weak CD in natural materials. The chiro-optical effects can be enhanced by using layered chiral woodpile structures as photonic crystals or optical metamaterials. Our study reveals that light scattering at a chiral plasmonic woodpile can be understood by considering the evanescent Floquet states within the structure. Moreover, we demonstrate the existence of a broadband circular polarization bandgap in various plasmonic woodpiles, which could lead to an ultra-broadband circularly polarized thermal source.
The circular dichroism (CD) of a material is the difference in optical absorption under left-and right-circularly polarized illumination. It is crucial for a number of applications, from molecular sensing to the design of circularly polarized thermal light sources. The CD in natural materials is typically weak, leading to the exploitation of artificial chiral materials. Layered chiral woodpile structures are well known to boost chiro-optical effects when realized as a photonic crystal or an optical metamaterial. We here demonstrate that light scattering at a chiral plasmonic woodpile, which is structured on the order of the wavelength of the light, can be well understood by considering the fundamental evanescent Floquet states within the structure. In particular, we report a broadband circular polarization bandgap in the complex band structure of various plasmonic woodpiles that spans the optical transparency window of the atmosphere between 3 and 4 mu m and leads to an average CD of up to 90% within this spectral range. Our findings could pave the way for an ultra-broadband circularly polarized thermal source.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据