4.7 Article

Aortic Valve Replacement and the Ross Operation in Children and Young Adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 67, 期 24, 页码 2858-2870

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.021

关键词

aortic valve disease; aortic valve replacement; congenital heart disease; Ross procedure

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit
  2. British Heart Foundation [PG/15/33/31394] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. The Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust [14/JTA] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND There are several options available for aortic valve replacement (AVR), with few comparative reports in the literature. The optimal choice for AVR in each age group is not clear. OBJECTIVES The study sought to report and compare outcomes after AVR in the young using data from a national database. METHODS AVR procedures were compared after advanced matching, both in pairs and in a 3-way manner, using a Bayesian dynamic survival model. RESULTS A total of 1,501 patients who underwent AVR in the United Kingdom between 2000 and 2012 were included. Of these, 47.8% had a Ross procedure, 37.8% a mechanical AVR, 10.9% a bioprosthesis AVR, and 3.5% a homograft AVR, with Ross patients being significantly younger when compared to the other groups. Overall survival at 12 years was 94.6%. In children, the Ross procedure had a 12.7% higher event-free probability (death or any reintervention) at 10 years when compared to mechanical AVR (p = 0.05). We also compared all procedures except the homograft in a matched population of young adults, where the bioprosthesis had the lowest event-free probability of 78.8%, followed by comparable results in mechanical AVR and Ross, with 86.3% and 89.6%, respectively. Younger age was associated with mortality and pulmonary reintervention in the Ross group and with aortic reintervention in the mechanical AVR. Of all 3 options, only the patients undergoing the Ross procedure approached the survival of the general population. CONCLUSIONS AVR in the young achieves good results, with the Ross being overall better suited for this age group, especially in children. Although freedom from aortic valve reintervention is superior after the Ross procedure, the need for homograft reinterventions is an issue to take into account. All methods have advantages and limitations, with reinterventions being an issue in the long term for all, more crucially in smaller children. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据