4.8 Article

Bi-functional CeO2 coated NiCo-MgAl core-shell catalyst with high activity and resistance to coke and H2S poisoning in methane dry reforming

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 323, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122141

关键词

Dry reforming of methane; Core shell catalyst; Coke resistance; H2S tolerance; Hydrogen production

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A bi-functional core-shell catalyst has been developed for CO2 reforming of methane, which shows high catalytic activity and resistance to coke formation and H2S poisoning. The catalyst consists of a NiCo-MgAl@CeO2 core-shell structure, where the core is derived from a layered double hydroxide and the shell is made of CeO2. The catalyst exhibits high DRM activity and stability, enhanced resistance to H2S-induced deactivation, and negligible coke formation due to the steric confinement effect and the participation of lattice oxygen in coke oxidation.
A bi-functional core-shell catalyst is reported for CO2 reforming of methane, that combines high catalytic activity with resistance to both coke formation and deactivation by H2S poisoning. We developed a NiCo-MgAl@CeO2 core-shell catalyst incorporating a layered double hydroxide-derived core and a CeO2 shell that shows high DRM activity and stability and enhanced resistance to H2S-induced deactivation, while maintaining negligible coke formation through the steric confinement effect of the core-shell morphology and the participation of lattice oxygen of CeO2 in coke oxidation. Co addition in the core delays the onset of catalyst deactivation in the presence of H2S by altering sulfur chemisorption kinetics, and the lattice oxygen of the CeO2 shell suppresses steady-state catalyst deactivation under continuous H2S flow by oxidatively removing H2S under continuous replenishment by CO2. The synergistic and complementary properties of the NiCo-containing core and CeO2 shell results in simultaneous coke resistance and H2S tolerance of the bi-functional catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据