4.8 Article

Facile fabrication of rGO/PPy/nZVI catalytic microreactor for ultrafast removal of p-nitrophenol from water

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 342, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122270

关键词

Zerovalent iron; Graphene; Microreactor; Fenton-like reaction; P-nitrophenol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel microreactor was constructed by anchoring nZVI on the rGO/PPy substrate within the microchannel, which catalyzed the Fenton-like reaction to remove >99% PNP within 50 seconds. The rGO/PPy composite substrate stabilized the nZVI, facilitated the decomposition of H2O2, and promoted the redox cycle of Fe(III)/Fe(II). The significant convection and highly-effective mass transfer within the microreactor also contributed to the ultrafast PNP removal. The rGO/PPy/nZVI microreactor shows promise for pollutant removal from water.
The application of powdered nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) in conventional reactors for water treatment is limited by insufficient mass-transfer and difficult post-separation of catalysts. Herein, a novel microreactor was constructed by anchoring nZVI on the reduced graphene oxide/polypyrrole nanocomposite (rGO/PPy) substrate within the microchannel of a stainless-steel tube through two-step electrodeposition, which catalyzed the Fenton -like reaction to remove > 99% p-nitrophenol (PNP) within 50 s, outperforming traditional batch reactors. The rGO/PPy composite substrate consolidated the adhesion on steel surface, stabilized the nZVI by forming electron -transfer complex, facilitated the decomposition of H2O2 to free center dot OH, and promoted the redox cycle of Fe(III)/Fe (II) via the electron donating capacity of rGO/PPy. Besides, the significant convection and highly-effective mass transfer within the microreactor also contributed to the ultrafast PNP removal. With acceptable durability, easy re-generation, and scalability, the rGO/PPy/nZVI microreactor is promising for the ultrafast removal of pollut-ants from water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据