4.3 Article

The role of screening colonoscopy after appendicitis in patients over 40 years of age

期刊

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 93, 期 3, 页码 602-605

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ans.18325

关键词

appendicitis; colonoscopy; endoscopic screening

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of colorectal neoplasm in patients aged 40 years and over who underwent screening colonoscopy following acute appendicitis. The study found that 15% of patients had an adenomatous polyp detected and 9% had a non-adenomatous lesion detected.
BackgroundThere is some evidence of the association between acute appendicitis and colorectal neoplasm in patients over the age of 40 years. Despite this, few centres routinely evaluate the colon endoscopically following an episode of appendicitis in these patients. Our aim was to investigate the incidence of colorectal neoplasm in patients aged 40 years and over who underwent screening colonoscopy following acute appendicitis. MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients aged 40 years and over who were diagnosed with acute appendicitis via imaging or histology between January 2015 and May 2022. Findings on subsequent screening colonoscopy were evaluated and classified according to adenomatous and non-adenomatous lesions. ResultsA total of 176 patients met inclusion criteria, with a median age of 54 years (range 40-92) and female to male ratio of 1:1.3. One hundred patients (56%) had a colonoscopy following their admission, at a mean duration of 3.5 months post discharge. 15% of patients had an adenomatous polyp detected (10 adenomas, 4 advanced adenomas, and 1 sessile serrated adenoma), and 9% had a non-adenomatous lesion detected (8 hyperplastic polyps and 1 lipoma). ConclusionAdenoma detection rate in patients aged 40 years and over undergoing colonoscopy after acute appendicitis was 15% in our cohort. This high adenoma detection rate supports the view of appendicitis as an indication for screening faecal immunochemical testing or colonoscopy in patients above 40 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据