4.7 Editorial Material

Three-Port Transoral Robotic Thyroidectomy in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13663-5

关键词

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy; TORT; Robotic thyroidectomy; Transoral approach; Transoral thyroidectomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This video demonstrates a three-port transoral robotic thyroidectomy without axillary incision for papillary thyroid carcinoma. The surgery was successfully completed without any complications, and the patient was satisfied with the cosmetic result.
Background. Although transoral thyroidectomy has become popular in thyroid surgery, transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) has only been successfully applied in a very small number of medical centers worldwide.([1,2,3,4,5]) In this video, we show a three-port TORT without an axillary incision for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Patient and methods. A 35-year-old female with cT1aN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma had a strong motivation to proceed with surgery but avoid external neck incisions. Thus, we decided to perform a hemithyroidectomy with isthmusectomy using a transoral robotic approach, employing the da Vinci Xi surgical system. Results. The operation was completed successfully without conversion to open surgery. The working space creation time, docking time, and console time were 30 min, 40 min, and 130 min, respectively. The pathological results were papillary thyroid carcinoma with 6- and 5-mm tumors. The patient was discharged 4 days after surgery without any complications such as bleeding, infection, mental nerve damage, permanent hoarseness, or hypoparathyroidism. The patient was completely satisfied with the cosmetic result. Conclusion. Three-port TORT without an axillary incision is a promising approach with optimal cosmetic outcomes. For Vietnam, a developing country, success in the application of TORT using the new da Vinci Xi robotic platform for thyroid cancer is an important milestone in the development of thyroid surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据