4.6 Article

Non-classical testosterone signaling in spermatogenic GC-2 cells is mediated through ZIP9 interacting with Gnα11

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 2077-2086

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.07.013

关键词

Testosterone; GPCR; ZIP9; Gn alpha 11; Androgen receptor

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SCHE 307/7-1]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GRK 1871/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although classical and non-classical signaling of testosterone has been documented in several investigations, the nature of the receptor involved in the non-classical pathway remains a source of controversy. While some investigators favor the exclusive participation of the cytosolic/nuclear androgen receptor (AR) in both pathways, others propose a membrane-bound receptor as the mediator of the non-classical testosterone signaling. Evidence is provided here that in the spermatogenic cell line GC-2 the non-classical signaling pathway of testosterone, characterized through the activation of Erk1/2 and transcription factors like CREB or ATF-1, is not mediated through the classical nuclear androgen receptor (AR) but rather by a membrane-associated receptor. This receptor is ZIP9, a Zn2+ transporter from the family of the ZRT, IRT-like proteins (ZRT = zinc-regulated transporter; IRT = iron-regulated transporter), which directly interacts with the G-protein Gn alpha 11. siRNA-induced abrogation of the expression of either of these two proteins, whose close contacts are demonstrated by an in situ proximity assay, completely prevents all non-classical signaling effects of testosterone addressed. In contrast, silencing of AR expression does not influence the same signaling events. The identification of ZIP9/Gn alpha 11 interactions as the mediators of the non-classical testosterone signaling cascade in spermatogenic GC-2 cells might help to supplement our knowledge concerning the role of testosterone in male fertility and reproduction. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据