4.4 Article

Our Souls Look Back and Wonder: Reflections on Belonging and Being Invisible in Medicine

期刊

ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 S106-S108

出版社

ANNALS FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.1370/afm.2916

关键词

medical education; workforce; diversity; belonging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Addressing health disparities and diversifying the healthcare workforce are important priorities in public health. This article examines the experiences of underrepresented health professionals over four generations and highlights common themes of not belonging and feeling invisible. Despite the challenges, the authors express hope for the future.
Addressing the unequal impact of health disparities on historically marginalized communities is a top public health priority. Diversifying the work force has been lauded as key to addressing this challenge. Contributing to diversity in the workforce is the recruitment and retention of health professionals previously excluded and underrepresented in medicine. A major obstacle to retention, however, is the unequal way in which health professionals experience the learning environment. Through this perspective of 4 generations of physicians and medical students, the authors seek to highlight the similarities that have persisted over 40 years in the experiences of being underrepresented in medicine. Through a series of conversations and reflective writing, the authors reveal themes that spanned generations. Two common themes among the authors are the feeling of not belonging and feeling invisible. This is experienced in various aspects of medical education and academic careers. The lack of representation, unequal expectations, and over taxation contributes to the feeling of not belonging, leading to emotional, physical, and academic fatigue. Feeling invisible, yet paradoxically being hyper-visible, is also common. Despite the challenges, the authors conclude with a sense of hope for the future, if not for them, for the generations to come.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据