4.5 Article

Assessment of predation risk through conspecific cues by anuran larvae

期刊

ANIMAL COGNITION
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 1431-1441

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-023-01793-y

关键词

Antipredator behavior; Disturbance cues; Larval amphibians; Pelobates cultripes; Risk assessment; Social learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the ability of anuran larvae to detect predation risk through indirect cues from conspecifics exposed to predator stimuli. The results show that larvae can perceive and respond to predation risk based on cues from conspecifics, indicating the importance of cognitive abilities in predator-prey interactions.
Accurate assessment of predation risk is critical for prey survival during predator-prey interactions. Prey can assess predation risk by the presence of cues dropped by predators themselves, but they can also gather information about risk level through cues released by other prey, avoiding the hazard of being in close proximity to predators. In this study, we examine the ability of anuran larvae (Pelobates cultripes) to detect predation risk indirectly when they are in contact with conspecifics that have been recently exposed to chemical stimuli from natural predators (larvae of aquatic beetles). In a first experiment, we confirmed that larvae exposed to predator cues exhibited innate defensive behavior, indicating that they perceived the risk of predation and, thus, could potentially act as risk indicators for naive conspecifics. In a second experiment, we observed that unexposed larvae paired with a startled conspecific adjusted their antipredator behavior, presumably by mirroring conspecifics' behavior and/or using chemical cues from their partners as a risk information source. This cognitive ability of tadpoles to assess predation risk through conspecific cues might play an important role in their interaction with predators, facilitating the early detection of potential threats to elicit appropriate antipredator responses and increase the chances of survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据