4.8 Article

Spontaneous Chirality Induction in the Assembly of a Single Layer 2D Network with Switchable Pores

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202300658

关键词

Chirality Induction; Enantioseparation; Self-Assembly; Supramolecular Networks; Switchable Pores

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers report spontaneous chirality induction in a single layer 2D network structure formed from the self-assembly of tetrapod azobenzene molecules. The chirality induction occurs due to the slipping of multiple sublayers in a preferred direction, where the sublayer consists of different molecular arrangements in the in-plane a and b directions, breaking both the plane of symmetry and inversion symmetry. The protruded azobenzene units in the pore interior can be selectively isomerized upon UV irradiation, resulting in a reversible deformation of the chiral pores while maintaining the 2D frameworks. The chiral network can selectively trap one enantiomer from a racemic solution and release it upon UV irradiation.
Although two-dimensional (2D) chiral sheet structures are attractive because of their unique chemical and physical properties, single layer 2D chiral network structures with switchable pore interior remain elusive. Here we report spontaneous chirality induction in a single layer 2D network structure formed from the self-assembly of tetrapod azobenzene molecules. The chirality induction arises from multiple sublayers slipped in a preferred direction in which the sublayer consists of unidentical molecular arrangements in the in-plane a and b directions, breaking both the plane of symmetry and inversion symmetry. The protruded azobenzene units in the pore interior can be selectively isomerized upon UV irradiation, resulting in a reversible deformation of the chiral pores while maintaining the 2D frameworks. The chiral network can thus selectively entrap one enantiomer from a racemic solution with near perfect enantioselectivity, and then release it upon UV irradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据