4.8 Article

Electrochemiluminescence Distance and Reactivity of Coreactants Determine the Sensitivity of Bead-Based Immunoassays

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202216525

关键词

Electrochemiluminescence; Immunoassay; Radical Lifetime; Reaction Mechanism; Reactivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the electrochemiluminescence (ECL) generation by Ru(bpy)(3)(2+) and five tertiary amine coreactants was investigated. The ECL distance and reactivity of the coreactants were measured, and the integrated ECL intensity was used to quantitatively evaluate the reactivity. Statistical analysis of ECL images of labeled microbeads showed that the ECL distance and reactivity of the coreactant determine the emission intensity and sensitivity of immunoassay. BIS-TRIS was found to balance the trade-off between ECL distance and reactivity, resulting in a 236% increase in sensitivity compared to TPrA in the bead-based immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen.
Herein we report the study of electrochemiluminescence (ECL) generation by tris(2,2 '-bipyridyl)ruthenium (Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)) and five tertiary amine coreactants. The ECL distance and lifetime of coreactant radical cations were measured by ECL self-interference spectroscopy. And the reactivity of coreactants was quantitatively evaluated in terms of integrated ECL intensity. By statistical analysis of ECL images of single Ru(bpy)(3)(2+)-labeled microbeads, we propose that ECL distance and reactivity of coreactant codetermine the emission intensity and thus the sensitivity of immunoassay. 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,2 ',2 ''-nitrilotriethanol (BIS-TRIS) can well balance ECL distance-reactivity trade-off and enhance the sensitivity by 236 % compared with tri-n-propylamine (TPrA) in the bead-based immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen. The study brings an insightful understanding of ECL generation in bead-based immunoassay and a way of maximizing the analytical sensitivity from the aspect of coreactant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据