4.4 Article

The Flavonoid Chrysin Protects against Testicular Apoptosis Induced by Torsion/Detorsion in Adult Rats

期刊

ANDROLOGIA
卷 2023, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1155/2023/6500587

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the beneficial effects of chrysin, a natural flavonoid, on testicular torsion/detorsion damage in adult male rats were examined. The results showed that chrysin can alleviate ischemia/reperfusion damage to testicular tissue and improve sperm quality.
In the present work, we examined the beneficial efficacy of chrysin as a natural flavonoid on testicular torsion/detorsion damages among adult male rats. Forty-eight male Wistar rats were randomly allocated into six groups: sham, torsion/detorsion (TD) group, TDC30 group in which TD process was applied and treated with chrysin (30 mg/kg), TDC50 group in which TD process was applied and treated with chrysin (50 mg/kg), HC30 group in which animals were treated with chrysin (30 mg/kg), and HC50 group in which rats were treated with chrysin (50 mg/kg). Serum samples were tested for testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. The sperm parameters, histopathological analysis, and expressions of apoptosis-related genes were examined among different groups. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in the testicles and serum were measured. Serum levels of SOD, GPx, FSH, LH, and Bax expression significantly increased in the TD group compared to the sham group (P<0.05). Sperm parameters, serum testosterone level, Johnson's scores, seminiferous tubule diameter, the height of the germinal epithelium (HE) measurements, and expression of Bcl2 meaningfully decreased (P<0.05). Administration of chrysin impeded ischemia/reperfusion damages in testis tissue and improved sperm quality. The result of our study indicates that treatment with chrysin can protect testis tissue from ischemia/reperfusion damages induced by TD procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据