4.8 Article

Symmetry in Cascade Chirality-Transfer Processes: A Catalytic Atroposelective Direct Arylation Approach to BINOL Derivatives

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 138, 期 16, 页码 5202-5205

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b01458

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81373303, 81473080, 81573299, 21502230]
  2. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation [BK20150688]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1193]
  4. Rice University
  5. NIH [R01 GM-114609-01]
  6. NSF [CAREER:-SusChEM CHE-1455335]
  7. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C-1764]
  8. ACS-PRF [51707-DNI1]
  9. Amgen
  10. Biotage
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  12. Division Of Chemistry [1546097] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein we disclose a scalable organo-catalytic direct arylation approach for the regio- and atroposelective synthesis of non-C-2-symmetric 2,2'-diliydroxy-1,1'-binaphthalenes (BINOLs). In the presence of catalytic amounts of axially chiral phosphoric acids, phenols and naphthols are coupled with iminoquinones via a cascade process that involves sequential aminal formation, sigmatropic rearrangement, and rearomatization to afford enantiomerically enriched BINOL derivatives in good to excellent yields. Our studies suggest that the (local) symmetry of the initially formed aminal intermediate has a dramatic impact on the level of enantioinduction in the final product. Aminals with a plane of symmetry give rise to BINOL derivatives with significantly lower enantiomeric excess than unsymmetrical ones featuring a stereogenic center. Presumably asymmetric induction in the sigmatropic rearrangement step is significantly more challenging than during aminal formation. Sigmatropic rearrangement of the enantiomerically enriched aminal and subsequent rearomatization transfers the central chirality into axial chirality with high fidelity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据