4.8 Article

Thermus thermophilus Argonaute-Based Isothermal Amplification Assay for Ultrasensitive and Specific RNA Detection

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 95, 期 21, 页码 8291-8298

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00599

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in prokaryotic Argonaute proteins (pAgos) have provided new insights into the development of pAgos-based nucleic acid detection platforms. However, the current challenge lies in achieving isothermal detection using pAgos. This study introduces a true isothermal amplification strategy called Thermus thermophilus Argonaute-based thermostable exponential amplification reaction (TtAgoEAR), which allows for RNA detection with ultra-sensitivity and single-nucleotide resolution at a constant temperature of 66 degrees C. The results demonstrate the potential of TtAgoEAR for reliable and easy RNA detection in point-of-care diagnosis and field analysis.
Recent advances in prokaryotic Argonauteproteins (pAgos)as potentialgenome-editing tools have provided new insights into the developmentof pAgos-based nucleic acid detection platforms. However, pAgos-basedisothermal detection remains challenging. Here, we report a true isothermalamplification strategy, termed Thermus thermophilus Argonaute-based thermostable exponential amplification reaction(TtAgoEAR), to detect RNA with ultrasensitivity andsingle-nucleotide resolution at a constant temperature of 66 degrees C.We demonstrate the reliable detection of lncRNA, mRNA, and virus RNAwith attomolar sensitivity and that TtAgoEAR canbe applied to detect RNA targets in in cell lines, saliva, and tissues.We utilize this assay to distinguish pancreatic cancer cells carryingthe mutation from wild-type cells with as little as 2 ng of RNA material.We also show that TtAgoEAR is easily adaptable toa lateral-flow-based readout. These results demonstrate that TtAgoEAR has great potential to facilitate reliable andeasy RNA detection in point-of-care diagnosis and field analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据