4.8 Article

Distinguishing Oligosaccharide Isomers Using Far-Infrared Ion Spectroscopy: Identification of Biomarkers for Inborn Errors of Metabolism

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 95, 期 26, 页码 9787-9796

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00363

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The room-temperature infrared spectra of ion-complexed saccharides recorded in the far-infrared wavelength range can distinguish isomeric saccharides and have high diagnostic value. This approach, combined with liquid chromatography, can identify saccharide biomarkers in complex sample matrices.
Distinguishing isomeric saccharides poses a major challengeforanalytical workflows based on (liquid chromatography) mass spectrometry(LC-MS). In recent years, many studies have proposed infraredion spectroscopy as a possible solution as the orthogonal, spectroscopiccharacterization of mass-selected ions can often distinguish isomericspecies that remain unresolved using conventional MS. However, thehigh conformational flexibility and extensive hydrogen bonding insaccharides cause their room-temperature fingerprint infrared spectrato have broad features that often lack diagnostic value. Here, weshow that room-temperature infrared spectra of ion-complexed saccharidesrecorded in the previously unexplored far-infrared wavelength range(300-1000 cm(-1)) provide well-resolved andhighly diagnostic features. We show that this enables distinctionof isomeric saccharides that differ either by their composition ofmonosaccharide units and/or the orientation of their glycosidic linkages.We demonstrate the utility of this approach from single monosaccharidesup to isomeric tetrasaccharides differing only by the configurationof a single glycosidic linkage. Furthermore, through hyphenation withhydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography, we identify oligosaccharidebiomarkers in patient body fluid samples, demonstrating a generalizedand highly sensitive MS-based method for the identification of saccharidesfound in complex sample matrices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据