4.5 Article

Characterization of beta subunit variants of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 668, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2023.115089

关键词

Recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin; Beta subunit; Analytical characterization; Non-glycosylation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a glycoprotein hormone, is used for infertility treatment. The beta (0-) subunit determines its specificity, while the alpha (a-) subunit is shared by gonadotropin family. Analysis showed that the beta (0-) subunit has two variants, 01 and 02, with different glycosylation patterns at Asn 13 and Asn 30.
Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), an endogenous glycoprotein hormone, has been widely used for the treatment of infertility and corpus luteum defect in women. The biological specificity of hCG is essentially determined by its beta (0-) subunit, whereas the alpha (a-) subunit is a common subunit shared among the gonadotropin family. In development of a therapeutic recombinant hCG, the purity analysis showed that the beta (0-) subunit has two variants, 01 and 02. Structural characterization using a combination of analytical techniques has demonstrated that 01-subunit is derived from non-glycosylation at Asn 13, whereas 02-subunit is a normal species with complete N-glycosylation at both Asn 13 and Asn 30. In vivo Bioactivity evaluation of the r-hCG fractions with various ratios of 01-and 02-subunits showed that incomplete glycosylation at Asn 13 potentially reduced the biological activity of r-hCG to promote uterus growth. Although hCG has a long history of medicinal use, this is the first report to identify the structural difference of hCG 0 -subunit variants, as well as to preliminary establish the structure-activity relationship of this variation. The obtained results also suggest the importance of variant characterization and necessary quality control of product variants during the development of recombi-nant protein therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据