4.5 Article

Viscosity of Earth's inner core constrained by Fe-Ni interdiffusion in Fe-Si alloy in an internal-resistive-heated diamond anvil cell

期刊

AMERICAN MINERALOGIST
卷 108, 期 6, 页码 1064-1071

出版社

MINERALOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2138/am-2022-8541

关键词

Earth's inner core; diffusion; viscosity; iron; silicon; high pressure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffusivity in Fe alloys at high pressures and temperatures imposes constraints on the transport properties of the inner core. The presence of Si must be considered when studying diffusivity, as it is a likely candidate for a light element in the inner core. In this study, we conducted diffusion experiments under high pressure using an internal-resistive-heated diamond-anvil cell, and determined the coefficients of Fe-Ni interdiffusion in the Fe-Si alloy. The results indicate that the effect of Si on Fe-Ni interdiffusion is not significant.
Diffusivity in iron (Fe) alloys at high pressures and temperatures imposes constraints on the transport properties of the inner core, such as viscosity. Because silicon (Si) is among the most likely candidates for light elements in the inner core, the presence of Si must be considered when studying difusivity in the Earth's inner core. In this study, we conducted diffusion experiments under pressures up to about 50 GPa using an internal-resistive-heated diamond-anvil cell (DAC) that ensures stable and homogeneous heating compared with a conventional laser-heated DAC and thus allows us to conduct more reliable difusion experiments under high pressure. We determined the coeficients of Fe-nickel (Ni) interdiffusion in the Fe-Si 2 wt% alloy. The obtained difusion coeficients follow a homologous temperature relationship derived from previous studies without considering Si. This indicates that the efect of Si on Fe-Ni interdifusion is not significant. The upper limit of the viscosity of the inner core inferred from our results is low, indicating that the Lorentz force is a plausible mechanism to deform the inner core.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据