4.7 Article

Lung Recruitment Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (RECRUIT) A Multicenter Study of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202212-2300OC

关键词

acute respiratory distress syndrome; lung recruitability; positive end-expiratory pressure; electrical impedance tomography; mechanical ventilation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to quantify lung recruitability and proposed a method to select optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on EIT. The researchers found that there is a wide variation in recruitability among COVID-19 patients, and EIT can help personalize PEEP setting to balance recruitability and overdistension.
Rationale: Defining lung recruitability is needed for safe positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection in mechanically ventilated patients. However, there is no simple bedside method including both assessment of recruitability and risks of overdistension as well as personalized PEEP titration. Objectives: To describe the range of recruitability using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), effects of PEEP on recruitability, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange, and a method to select optimal EIT-based PEEP. Methods: This is the analysis of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from an ongoing multicenter prospective physiological study including patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome of different causes. EIT, ventilator data, hemodynamics, and arterial blood gases were obtained during PEEP titration maneuvers. EIT-based optimal PEEP was defined as the crossing point of the overdistension and collapse curves during a decremental PEEP trial. Recruitability was defined as the amount of modifiable collapse when increasing PEEP from 6 to 24 cm H2O (Delta Collapse(24-6)). Patients were classified as low, medium, or high recruiters on the basis of tertiles of Delta Collapse(24-6). Measurements and Main Results: In 108 patients with COVID-19, recruitability varied from 0.3% to 66.9% and was unrelated to acute respiratory distress syndrome severity. Median EIT-based PEEP differed between groups: 10 versus 13.5 versus 15.5 cm H2O for low versus medium versus high recruitability (P < 0.05). This approach assigned a different PEEP level from the highest compliance approach in 81% of patients. The protocol was well tolerated; in four patients, the PEEP level did not reach 24 cm H2O because of hemodynamic instability. Conclusions: Recruitability varies widely among patients with COVID-19. EIT allows personalizing PEEP setting as a compromise between recruitability and overdistension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据