4.8 Article

Pathways for Arene Oxidation in Non-Heme Diiron Enzymes: Lessons from Computational Studies on Benzoyl Coenzyme A Epoxidase

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 138, 期 44, 页码 14623-14638

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b06987

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) [PD 108955]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygenation of aromatic rings using O-2 is catalyzed by several non-heme carboxylate-bridged diiron enzymes. In order to provide a general mechanistic description for these reactions, computational studies were carried out at the ONIOM(B3LYP/BP86/Amber) level on the non-heme diiron enzyme benzoyl coenzyme A epoxidase, BoxB. The calculations revealed four possible pathways for attacking the aromatic ring: (a) electrophilic (2e(-)) attack by a bis(mu-oxo)-diiron(IV) species (Q pathway); (b) electrophilic (2e(-)) attack via the sigma* orbital of a mu-eta(2):eta(2)-peroxo-diiron(III) intermediate (P sigma* pathway); (c) radical (1e(-)) attack via the pi*-orbital of a superoxo-diiron(II,III) species (P pi* pathway); (d) radical (1e(-)) attack of a partially quenched bis(mu-oxo)-diiron(IV) intermediate (Q' pathway). The results allowed earlier work of de Visser on olefin epoxidation by diiron complexes and QM-cluster studies of Liao and Siegbahn on BoxB to be put into a broader perspective. Parallels with epoxidation using organic peracids were also examined. Specifically for the BoxB enzyme, the Q pathway was found to be the most preferred, but the corresponding bis(mu-oxo)-diiron(IV) species is significantly destabilized and not expected to be directly observable. Epoxidation via the P sigma* pathway represents an energetically somewhat higher lying alternative; possible strategies for experimental discrimination are discussed. The selectivity toward epoxidation is shown to stem from a combination of inherent electronic properties of the thioacyl substituent and enzymatic constraints. Possible implications of the results for toluene monooxygenases are considered as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据