4.6 Article

EPO gene expression promotes proliferation, migration and invasion via the p38MAPK/AP-1/MMP-9 pathway by p21WAF1 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 470-478

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.12.001

关键词

Vascular smooth muscle cells; EPO gene; p21WAF1; p38MAPK; AP-1; Migration

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2008-0062611]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26660086] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) can lead to hypertrophy and hyperplasia, and has induced the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). The effect of the EPO gene in the migration and invasion of VSMCs remains unclear. In this study, overexpression of the EPO gene increased the DNA synthesis and phosphoiylation of ERK1/2 and p38MAPK in VSMCs. In addition, EPO gene expression induced the migration and invasion of VSMCs via the expression of MMP-9 by the activation of NF-kappa B and AP-1 binding. A blockade of p38MAPK by specific p38MAPK inhibitor SB203580 led to a suppression of the increased DNA synthesis, migration, and invasion of VSMCs that was induced by the EPO gene. SB203580 treatment blocked the increased expression of MMP-9 through the binding activity of AP-1. Transfection of the EPO gene with VSMCs was associated with the up-regulation of cyclin D1/CDK4, cyclin E/CDK2, and p21WAF1, and with the down-regulation of p27KIP1. The specific suppression of p21WAF1 expression by siRNA rescued the enhancement of DNA synthesis via the phosphoiylation of p38MAPK and the increase in migration and invasion through AP-1-mediated MMP-9 expression in EPO gene transfectants. These novel findings demonstrate that p21WAF1 regulates the proliferation, migration and invasion of VSMC induced by EPO gene. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据